So the axe has finally fallen on Karl Dorrell and he will not coach the Bruins in their bowl game or ever again. It was something I began calling for in earnest after the debacle at Utah earlier this season. Now, I'd never wish ill on anyone, but Dorrell leaving was the best thing for the UCLA program. The problem is I'm not sure how you so easily go about making things better. What I do know is that Dorrell was not the man to continue leading the Bruins into the future. Say what you will about his character, what a good man he is and how he restored the program's reputation in terms of limiting embarrassing off-field incidents during his tenure. Those are all good, positive things, but the bottom line in major college athletics these days is that it's about winning. For better or worse, that's the reality. The problem at UCLA is that, No. 1, it's a basketball school. Eleven national championships tend to give an institution such a label. Another issue is that UCLA has never paid its football coach and staff on par with the top programs in the country. Dorrell earned about $800,000 this season, a figure that is ridiculously low relative to the multimillion-dollar contracts that every coach in the SEC and elsewhere seemed to have inked. And then remember the cost of living. It's not as if L.A. is a very inexpensive place to live. Perhaps no other college football market in the country has to deal with such a limitation. No wonder a guy like Chris Petersen of Boise State, an up and coming coach if there ever was one, thumbs his nose at UCLA when he's mentioned as a possible candidate. Petersen, I believe, is making more than Dorrell this season AND living in Boise. One of his biggest decisions in life is probably trying to figure out what to do with the acres and acres of land he must own. That's not the case for a UCLA coach, and much less for his assistants. Most Bruin assistants (and even Dorrell I think) are forced to live in suburbs far from campus so they can afford a decent home for their family. At most other places, the assistants (and the head coach) live close to campus, thus helping foster the relationship with players, and how can you even begin to put a value on what means to a program? Which brings us back to the original point: how do you get a quality coach to come to a place like UCLA? Remember, though Dorrell was part of the UCLA family as a former player, the athletic department went the cheap route when hiring him as he had no previous head coaching experience. That can't happen this time. The Bruins need someone with experience and with a name. They also need to do their best to have this coach understand that keeping at least some of the current coaching staff (namely defensive coordinator DeWayne Walker) in tact as part of the new regime is paramount. UCLA, by some reports, is set to bring in one of the nation's top recruiting classes next season.
A coaching change certainly can't help this scenario so it's up to the administration to keep these impressionable high school kids from jumping ship. The kids need to feel that, when it comes to football at least, there still are plenty of reasons to stay put in Westwood. Walker's retention would be reason No. 1 for kids to hold firm. Which brings me to who should be the next coach. It's Steve Mariucci. Yes, I know he only coached one season in college at Cal, a few more in the NFL and is currently out of coaching while working for the NFL Network. But what Mariucci has that Dorrell sorely lacked is a presence. He has savvy as well the kind of personality that fits well in a place like L.A. where style seems to matter immensely and a city that already boasts larger-than-life coaching personalities such as Joe Torre, Phil Jackson, Mike Scioscia and of course Pete Carroll (not to mention guys like Pat Riley, Tom Lasorda, etc). It's Carroll who factors into the Mariucci equation.
With a guy like Mariucci and his movie-star good looks patroling the sidelines and sitting in the living rooms of recruits and working the media like he can, it would at least give UCLA more equal footing in the public-relations battle with the crosstown Trojans and thus hopefully create a cloud of confidence that could hover for a long time. Perception is reality indeed. Mariucci is really the only move UCLA can make under these circumstances with the hope of coming out clean on the other end. And the sooner AD Dan Guerrero realizes this, the sooner the healing can begin for Bruin fans and the program, and the sooner it might actually be believable that UCLA can compete with USC from year to year.