A Kobe BOW? Say It Ain't So
So has Kobe Bryant become a member of the BOW club? I never thought I'd have to include him in this group, but apparently the NBA thought what he did to Manu Ginobili of the San Antonio Spurs on Sunday was more intentional than it appeared and suspended the star guard from tonight's game against the New York Knicks. You can read the story here. In the closing seconds of regulation Sunday, Ginobili blocked Kobe's shot from the wing, but on the follow-through Kobe's arm came angling down in a strange fashion with his elbow catching Ginobili's face. To be honest, at the time it did cross my mind that what he did was done with a purpose but nothing was called so I quickly forgot about it. No foul, no technical, no ejection, nothing. It probably didn't help that Kobe seemed to coldly walk away after Ginobili was in obvious pain (as the photo shows) on the floor, although you could attribute Kobe's reaction as being in the spirit of the game since it came at a crucial moment and he was bound to be wrapped up in intensity. The other thing I thought was that maybe Kobe was trying to draw a foul call and therefore exaggerated the motion of his arm to draw the referee's attention. But now I've got to wonder if it had been Bruce Bowen or Michael Finley or Robert Horry guarding him and coming up with the blocked shot, would Kobe have flailed the same way?
Incidentally, Kobe had this to say about the suspension: "I'm surprised. Shocked, by it, actually. I unintentionally caught Manu Ginobili. What do you say? It's a basketball game. You unintentionally catch people with elbows every once in a while." But NBA discipline czar Stu Jackson saw it differently, saying: "... this particular action by Kobe was an unnatural basketball motion... We did not view this as an inadvertent action." Hmm, that speaks volumes for the BOW theory. The other interesting factor here is that none of the Spurs players nor coach Greg Popovich said what Kobe did was intentional. Even Ginobili seemed to accept that this was just part of the game. See the video for yourself below and make your judgement.


5 comments:
I too was a bit surprised by the suspension. Saw Stu Jackson on the commuter train this morning and, if he wasn't on the phone, I might have said something (of course, I wouldn't have, but it makes me feel better to think I might). But a little montage on SportsCenter reminded me of a prior 2-game suspension against Kobe for an elbow to the throat of a certain Mike Miller. A BOW pattern, anyone?
Kobe definitely flailed...as he does a lot now, trying to get a foul call.
But did he try to hurt Manu? No. Did he try to flail? Yes.
Should be have gotten suspended? Heck no. He didn't intentionally try to hurt him.
If this is the new "law" in the NBA, then they should retroactively suspend Dikembe Mutombo for 2 or 3 seasons for all the "unintentional elbows" he's thrown over the years that ended up breaking noses and cheek bones.
And how about the NBA office making sure Kobe doesn't get the "chosen son" treatment and dismissed his call for an emergency hearing...? How's that for a slap in the face to Mr. Bryant.
The majority of the pain from this play was inflicted on the Celtics last night when Kobe got off! Dumb call by the league, although I do agree that his throwing the arm was a childish attempt at drawing the foul, however not worthy of the suspension.
Did anyone see the end of the game in overtime? That was the crapiest out of bounds play I've seen since the days of the lambs....1. how do you not get Kobe the ball? 2. Radmonovic shoting a fall away 25 footer, to lose a game they clearly should have won. They called two timeouts to set that up?
Rambus must be play calling....
Not sure if any one saw Kobe's reverse dunk last night, it looked more like #23 than #24.
first off, i'd like to say that i absolutely love "the law" moniker. man, you shouldda told Stu Jackson to eff off. and i think you definitely could be on to something by bringing up the mike miller incident. basketball, i'm torn about whether kobe did this on purpose or not. i'm wondering if he flailed a little more, if you know what i mean, knowing it was ginobili guarding him. scoach, i agree that a suspension wasn't warranted. i think it sets a dangerous precendent because it leaves everything to subjective interpretation if no call was made on the court. anyway, just wanted to say thanks to you all for commenting.
I enjoyed reading your blog. Keep it that way.
Post a Comment